e-discovery, digital data, esi, edd, courthouse, statehouse, litigation, zoning, variances, developer, appeals, land use law, specializing, specialist, mlul, speeding tickets, drunk driving, expungements

E- Discovery Consultant for Law Firms and Corporate Counsel

Matthew J. Ahearn
Attorney at Law

Litigation Technology Consulting

Pardon the appearance,  this site is under construction

Ahearn Legal Technology Consulting: 

Ediscovery Services Provided

Project Management, Ediscovery Liaison for Rule 26 Conference, Deposition and Trial Support

Provides Rule 26 preparation support,  legal "burden analysis" and objective case management conference support or motion hearing testimony to assist in responding to overly broad and unduly burdensome discovery requests related to electronically stored information (ESI).  Provides technical assistance in preparing and responding to discovery requests regarding the preservation, collection, processing, production and authentication of ESI.  Investigates, analyzes and estimates adversary's capabilities and likely policies.  Provides technical assistance preparing for and during depositions, trial preparation, and courtroom presentations.

Technology Assessment and Project Management

Assess the technological environment to account for organizational, technical and logistical issues that impact effective data gathering.  Provides objective evaluation of technology and vendor skill / experience / capabilities as guided by your defined objectives and priorities. Provides efficient and independent oversight of IT department or vendor e-discovery and litigation support projects.

Data Gathering and Production Strategies

Assists Corporate Counsel and outside trial counsel plan cost effective secure and comprehensive data preservation, gathering, and processing  strategies. Provides independent analysis of various vendors' options for   solutions using appropriately scaled forensically sound procedures designed to minimize the costs, risk, and impact on business operations.  Assists in determining what metadata is relevant to a litigation matter and what is not.

Preparation of E-Discovery Policy and Protocols

Educates management and employees, each at appropriate levels, about ediscovery best practices.  Assists in-house and trial counsel prepare ediscovery plans in compliance with applicable legal standards regarding preservation and collection of electronic data.  Provides valuable insight into an opponent's information systems for preparing offensive discovery strategies.  Coordinates ediscovery activities between corporate counsel, outside litigators, technology IT staff members and vendors on your team to develop plans that address ESI preservation, collection processes, dedupication and repopulation of metadata, chain of custody, chain of evidence, authentication and production of responsive materials.  

Documenting the Process

Provides support or takes responsibility for the project's documentation during the preservation and data gathering processes and litigation support through trial when needed.  Provides supervisory assistance of your litigation support staff and/or your vendors.

Electronic Discovery Library Maintenance

Assists with drafting and maintaining updated collections of preservation demand letters, model orders regarding electronic data management, electronic document reviews and productions; draft interrogatories and requests for production and inspection of things regarding electronic data; Notice of 30(b)(6) Depositions and other inspections regarding information technology devices and systems.



New Jersey
Pittsburg, PA


E-MAIL:  Matthew J. Ahearn, Esq.

Tel:   (304)-312-1945

Attorney Advertising

State and local government relations, OPRA, Open public records, FOIA, ediscovery, information governance

Under Construction


Matt Ahearn

under construction

© Matthew J. Ahearn 2000 - 2018,  All Rights Reserved.


this section of the page contains terms that might have helped you find this page with a search engine

Early Consideration of ESI Rules 26(f) and 16
Exchanging information in electronic form has significant benefits
it can substantially reduce copying, transport, and storage costs; enable the requesting party to more easily review, organize, and manage information; facilitate the use of computerized litigation support systems; and set the stage for the use of digital evidence presentation systems during pretrial and trial proceedings. To ensure
that these benefits are achieved and any problems associated with ESI are minimized, attorneys and parties should address ESI in the earliest stages of litigation, and judges should encourage them to do so.
All too often, attorneys view their obligation to meet and confer
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) as a perfunctory exercise.
When ESI is involved, judges should insist that a meaningful Rule 26(f) conference take place and that a meaningful discovery plan be submitted. Amended Rule 26(f) directs parties to discuss any issues relating to disclosure or discovery of ESI, including the form or forms in which it should be produced. More specifically, the parties should inquire into whether there will be discovery of ESI at all; what information each party has in electronic form and where that information resides; whether the information to be discovered has been deleted or is available only on backup tapes or legacy systems; the anticipated schedule for production and the format and media of that production; the difficulty and cost of producing
Managing Discovery of Electronic Information
the information

A proposed new Federal Rule of Evidence 502 was published for comment in August 2006. It (1) provides that inadvertent disclosure of privileged or protected information in connection with a federal proceeding constitutes a waiver only if the party did not take reasonable precautions to prevent disclosure and did not make reasonable and prompt efforts to rectify the error; (2) provides that when a confidentiality
order governing disclosure is entered in a federal proceeding, according to terms agreed to by the parties, the orders terms are enforceable against nonparties
in any other federal or state proceedings; and (3) codifies the proposition that parties can enter an agreement to limit the effect of waiver by disclosure between or among themselves, and makes clear that if the parties want protection from a finding
of waiver by disclosure in separate litigation, the agreement must be made part of a court order. The proposed rule also limits the circumstances in which a subject-matter waiver should be found and includes a provision on selective waiver.
Managing Discovery of Electronic Information 17
tion of discoverable information, particularly with respect to ESI because of its dynamic, mutable nature. In doing so, parties should attempt to balance the need to preserve relevant information and the need to continue routine computer operations critical to a party’s
The court may help ensure that parties meet their responsibilities
for preserving information and avoid allegations of spoliation by reviewing with them steps for establishing and implementing an effective data-preservation policy. These include (1) allowing the partys discovery liaison to readily describe information systems,
storage, and retention policies to the opposing party and the court; (2) interviewing key employees to determine sources of information;
(3) affirmatively and repeatedly communicating litigation
holds to all affected parties and monitoring compliance on an ongoing basis; (4) integrating discovery responsibilities with routine
retention policies; (5) actively managing and monitoring document
collections; (6) thoroughly documenting and demonstrating the efficacy of the preservation process; and (7) preparing to take responsibility for ensuring that information is preserved, collected, and produced.23
In some cases, a preservation order that clearly defines the obligations
of the producing party

Internet Law and Intellectual Property Law; litigation and transactional; New Jersey, Digital evidence, electronic evidence, digital discovery rules, Federal court, law; Web site development agreements; software licenses; http://www.mattahearn.com, domain names and cybersquatting; online contextual marketing, advertising, trademarks; copyrights; trade secrets; technology transfers; employment, confidentiality and non-compete agreements and disputes; Web publishing; privacy policies; click-wrap and click-through agreements; privacy, ezpass, gps, cell phone, pws, personal wireless services,piracy of satellite TV signals; anticircumvention under Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); First Amendment; anonymous online speech; defamation; Communications Decency Act (CDA); privacy; Federal Wiretap Act (FWA); Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA); Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); Gram Leach Bliley Act (GLBA); commercial litigation; Lawyers, attorney, attorneys, firm, New, Jersey, practicing, concentrating, specializing, cyberlaw, computer, e_commerce, technology, digital discovery, e-evidence, DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, piracy, pirates, anticircumvention, software, IP, bankruptcy, appeals, commercial, civil, litigation, intellectual property, intellectual property, e-commerce, internet, anonymous speech, online anonymous speech, free speech, first amendment, defamation, libel, blog, bloging, blogging, chat room, slander, privacy, private, electronic privacy, e, commerce, electronic, ecommerce, copyright, trade mark, trademark, trade name, corporate, ebusiness, government relations, lawyer-lobbyist, legislation, tracking, research, opinion, expert witness, New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL) and Appeals.
Internet Law.  Litigation involving digital discovery rules and forensic computing.
Estate Litigation, State and Local Government Relations.  Election Law.